"Remember teamwork begins by building trust. And the only way to do that is to overcome our need for invulnerability." -Patrick Lencioni
TEAMWORK STATEMENT
Rooted in mindfulness, humility, and a commitment to equity, I support collaborative care environments grounded in trust and clear, intentional communication. As a CNA, I strive to be a reliable and attentive team member, helping create spaces where individuals feel respected, heard, and valued for their unique perspectives. By listening closely to patients and team members, observing changes, and communicating concerns, I contribute to safe, high-quality, whole-person care. I aim to support a culture where team members feel comfortable speaking up, so we can better care for both our patients and one another.
3 ESSENTIAL COMMUNICATION SKILLS
CLOSED LOOP COMMUNICATION
PROMOTES CLARITY & SAFETY
What it is:
A structured communication method where information is sent, received, and confirmed.
Why it matters:
Prevents errors—especially during high-risk moments like medication administration or patient handoffs.
Example:
A physician says, “Give 5 mg of morphine IV.”
The nurse responds, “5 mg morphine IV, correct?”
The physician confirms, “Correct.”
Impact:
Ensures accuracy, reduces miscommunication, and strengthens team coordination.
ASSERTIVE COMMUNICATION
SPEAKING UP WITH RESPECT
What it is:
Clearly expressing concerns, questions, or observations while maintaining respect for others.
Why it matters:
Helps overcome hierarchy—a known barrier in health care that can prevent critical information from being shared.
Example:
A nursing student notices a change in a patient’s condition and says:
“I’m concerned about this patient’s breathing changes. Can we reassess together?”
Impact:
Promotes patient safety, builds trust, and encourages a culture where all voices matter.
ACTIVE LISTENING
UNDERSTANDING AND COLLABORATION
What it is:
Fully focusing on, interpreting, and responding thoughtfully to what others are saying.
Why it matters:
Supports shared understanding across disciplines and reduces fragmentation of care.
Example:
During interdisciplinary rounds, a nurse listens to a physical therapist’s input and reflects:
“So the goal is to increase mobility safely before discharge—how can we coordinate that with pain management?”
Impact:
Improves collaboration, aligns care plans, and strengthens relationships within the team.
3 EXAMPLES OF CONFLICT RESOLUTION
Effective collaboration within multidisciplinary teams is essential to delivering safe, equitable, and patient-centered care. In complex clinical environments, conflict often arises due to time pressure, unclear goals, unfamiliar team dynamics, hierarchical structures, and limited psychological safety. The following examples illustrate these challenges and approach to resolving them in a way that prioritizes both patient outcomes and team cohesion.
ADDRESSING TIME PRESSURE & UNCLEAR GOALS
Structured communication tools and reframing shared goals can override hierarchy and improve safety—even under time pressure.
Scenario:
An emergency department team (physician, nurse, case manager, and pharmacist) is preparing to discharge an older adult patient. The physician wants rapid discharge to free up a bed, while the nurse is concerned the patient is not safe to go home. The case manager is unclear whether home health has been arranged. Communication is rushed and fragmented.
Contributing Factors:
Time pressure (ED overcrowding)
Unclear shared goal (throughput vs. patient safety)
Hierarchical dynamic (physician driving decision)
Low psychological safety (nurse hesitant to challenge)
Conflict:
The nurse passively delays discharge tasks instead of openly disagreeing. The physician interprets this as inefficiency, escalating tension.
Resolution Approach:
The charge nurse initiates a brief interdisciplinary huddle
Uses structured communication (SBAR: Situation, Background, Assessment, Recommendation)
Explicitly reframes the goal: “Safe and timely discharge”
Invites each role to contribute input
Outcome:
Pharmacist identifies medication confusion risk
Case manager confirms delay in home health setup
Physician revises plan to short observation admission
Key Learning:
Structured communication tools and reframing shared goals can override hierarchy and improve safety—even under time pressure.
ADDRESSING LACK OF FAMILIARITY AND HIERARCHY
Actively inviting input and using closed-loop communication reduces hierarchy-driven errors and improves team alignment.
Scenario:
A newly formed inpatient team includes a resident physician, attending physician, bedside nurse, physical therapist, and a float nurse unfamiliar with the unit. During rounds, the attending quickly outlines a plan without inviting input.
Contributing Factors:
Lack of familiarity among team members
Strong hierarchy (attending dominates discussion)
Limited psychological safety (others don’t speak up)
Ambiguous care priorities (mobility vs. medical stabilization)
Conflict:
The physical therapist believes early mobilization is critical, but the resident documents strict bed rest. The nurse is confused and follows the written order. This leads to delayed recovery.
Resolution Approach:
Physical therapist speaks up and escalates concern respectfully after rounds
Suggests a “clarification pause” with the team
Attending acknowledges gap and invites input in a follow-up mini-round
Team agrees to use closed-loop communication (repeat-back of plan)
Outcome:
Updated plan includes supervised ambulation
Nurse feels more confident asking questions going forward
Attending commits to asking: “Any concerns?” during rounds
Key Learning:
Actively inviting input and using closed-loop communication reduces hierarchy-driven errors and improves team alignment.
ADDRESSING PSYCHOLOGICAL SAFETY AND UNCLEAR ROLES
Psychological safety improves when roles are clarified and teams normalize shared responsibility for communication—not just physician-led dialogue.
Scenario:
An ICU team (intensivist, nurse, social worker, and respiratory therapist) prepares for a family meeting about goals of care. Roles are not clearly defined. The intensivist leads with highly medical language, while the nurse and social worker notice the family is overwhelmed but feel unable to interrupt.
Contributing Factors:
Unclear team roles in communication
Hierarchical structure (physician-centered conversation)
Low psychological safety (others hesitate to interject)
Emotional intensity and time constraints
Conflict:
Family becomes confused and distressed. After the meeting, the nurse expresses frustration privately, saying the conversation “missed the patient’s values.”
Resolution Approach:
Team conducts a post-event debrief
Social worker introduces a framework: pre-brief before family meetings
Roles clarified:
Physician: medical overview
Nurse: patient context and bedside perspective
Social worker: emotional support and value elicitation
Agreement to use “pause and check” moments during meetings
Outcome:
Next meeting includes clearer, more compassionate communication
Nurse feels empowered to speak during discussion
Family expresses better understanding and trust
Key Learning:
Psychological safety improves when roles are clarified and teams normalize shared responsibility for communication—not just physician-led dialogue.
“As much as others may need to change, or we may want them to change, the only person we can continually inspire, prod, and shape—with any degree of success—is the person in the mirror.” ― Kerry Patterson
Sources:
Botchwey, C. O., Acquah-Greens, J., Adutwumwaa, S., Aggrey-Bluwey, L., Opoku-Mensah, F. A., & Nkpetri, E. S. (2026). Healthcare conflict management in resource-constrained settings: evidence from two hospitals in Ghana. Human resources for health, 24(1), 17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12960-026-01053-3
van Dongen, D., Tresfon, J., Guldenmund, F., Roos, D., Groeneweg, J., & Grossmann, I. (2025). Beyond the individual: a qualitative case study into the systemic determinants of speaking-up behaviour in multidisciplinary team meetings. BMJ open quality, 14(2), e003335. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-003335